Oussebon
Multiverse Poster
The frequencies are normally lowered before the point at which we usually think of thermal throttling (i.e. hitting 100 degrees and nerfing frequencies to prevent damage). As Kitguru put it:
That may be power limits plus anything else Tongfang etc put in their BIOS to premptively manage frequencies before they get too toasty. As well as relatively capable cooling compared to other chassis apparently.
So this person's Recoil seems the exception.
1) The OPS didn't mention what load conditions they've tested the laptop in since they got it back, but if it's just gaming, PCS can't really put laptops out to review and create an expectation of temps in the 80s or even lower under intensive real-life workloads and say "oh, yeah, upto 98 degrees, that's cool"
2) The initial RMA was with temps of upto 99 degrees, so that seemed to be something PCS agreed was probably not okay. But 98 degrees after a repaste is okay?
3) PCS's RMA ticket claimed lower temps. That's not what the OP's seeing it seems.
4) PCS seem to be blaming the Recoil as "it's a thin laptop, what do you expect" whereas the Recoil, as per forum reports and reviews like the above, has consistently been a better performer thermally than Clevos.
If I were the OP I'd return for a refund if at all possible, and review my options. If my laptop was behaving worse than apparently everyone else's, I wouldn't consider that satisfactory.
Starting with the CPU, a peak of just 81C is a top result, and that is only furthered by the fact that this temperature came with the CPU clock speed holding at 3.1GHz across all cores. The GS65, for instance, could only push all 6 cores to 2.8GHz, and even then the CPU still peaked at 85C.
PC Specialist Recoil II (i7-8750H & GTX 1060) Laptop Review - KitGuru
The PC Specialist Recoil II is the latest laptop to come through our labs sporting an Intel 8th Gen
www.kitguru.net
That may be power limits plus anything else Tongfang etc put in their BIOS to premptively manage frequencies before they get too toasty. As well as relatively capable cooling compared to other chassis apparently.
So this person's Recoil seems the exception.
1) The OPS didn't mention what load conditions they've tested the laptop in since they got it back, but if it's just gaming, PCS can't really put laptops out to review and create an expectation of temps in the 80s or even lower under intensive real-life workloads and say "oh, yeah, upto 98 degrees, that's cool"
2) The initial RMA was with temps of upto 99 degrees, so that seemed to be something PCS agreed was probably not okay. But 98 degrees after a repaste is okay?
3) PCS's RMA ticket claimed lower temps. That's not what the OP's seeing it seems.
4) PCS seem to be blaming the Recoil as "it's a thin laptop, what do you expect" whereas the Recoil, as per forum reports and reviews like the above, has consistently been a better performer thermally than Clevos.
If I were the OP I'd return for a refund if at all possible, and review my options. If my laptop was behaving worse than apparently everyone else's, I wouldn't consider that satisfactory.