Real Users' Benchmarks - Rank of PCS Laptops

[solidus1983]

New Results Max Fan High Performance on both CCC and Power Plan

Firestrike: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71009640 (OC)
Firestrike Extreme: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71009985 (PB) (OC)
Firestrike Ultra: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010150 (PB) (OC)
Timespy: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010351 (PB) (OC)
Timespy Extreme: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010554 (PB) (OC)
Port Royal: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010701 (PB) (OC)

This is also on a Custom VCurve on the GPU via MSI After Burner

I have also updated Post #290 with Stock Clocks and settings with 2933MT/s results too

@FerrariVie Time to update the table.

 

[Scott]

Is it a manual OC you have on the CPU? For pushing the OC the CPU score seems a little low to me, not much... but I think there's more in it. I wouldn't push the GPU any further though and just be aware that overclocking the GPU voids your warranty.

 

[solidus1983]

Is it a manual OC you have on the CPU? For pushing the OC the CPU score seems a little low to me, not much... but I think there's more in it. I wouldn't push the GPU any further though and just be aware that overclocking the GPU voids your warranty.

Is this question for me to answer if so, more then welcome to answer it in a Private Message as not to go off topic and will gladly explain everything thought process. As for CPU its a Non K SKU so no overclocking can be done its purely down to GPU.

 

[Scott]

Is this question for me to answer if so, more then welcome to answer it in a Private Message as not to go off topic and will gladly explain everything thought process. As for CPU its a Non K SKU so no overclocking can be done its purely down to GPU.

Ahh yes, of course it is. It's strange that other results have the clock speed higher. Not sure how they are managing it

 

[FerrariVie]

Ranks updated, finally 😅

 

[solidus1983]

Ranks updated, finally 😅

Smashing bud, not sure if the Benchmark runs i did stock with 2133MT/s Single & Dual Channel, 2666MT/s Dual Channel & 2933MT/s Dual Channel is of any use its in post #290.

Also noticed you put +235 is an above stock or offset set? as I was on V-Curve on core and +185 on vram.

 

[FerrariVie]

Also noticed you put +235 is an above stock or offset set? as I was on V-Curve on core and +185 on vram.

It's whatever I can see on the benchmark, which in this case is the max frequency difference compared to the stock run (either yours or someone else's with a similar build).

 

[MichaelFitzpatrick93]

Laptop is 6 months old at the time of doing this benchmark but thought I'd post this as I haven't seen another build with these specs.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71221411

 

[barlew]

Laptop is 6 months old at the time of doing this benchmark but thought I'd post this as I haven't seen another build with these specs.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71221411

Which laptop is it?

 

[solidus1983]

It's whatever I can see on the benchmark, which in this case is the max frequency difference compared to the stock run (either yours or someone else's with a similar build).

Ah ok, just thought i'd mention it that all just incase, after all someone might think its an Offset and then enter it in and wonder why it doesn't run the benchmarks without crashing the driver or the benchmark software or both.

 

[JohnMuscat729]

Stock

Chassis and Spec	Firestrike 3DMark	Graphics​	Physics	Avg. GPU Temps	URL	User
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU + max fans)	25386	29260	25125	58°	Link	@KriSta
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3080	25081	28891	24650	56°	Link	@barlew
* Recoil 17" / i7 11700K / RTX 3080	24838	29885	26680	66°	Link	@Tron1982
* Recoil 17" / i7 11700K / RTX 3080	24538	30951	24020	49°	Link	@elweegie
* Recoil 17" / i9 11900k / RTX 3070	24381	28564	26357	66°	Link	@MarkPhillips205
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)	24207	27309	24796	68°	Link	@KriSta
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3080 (dGPU only)	24202	27895	23215	69°	Link	@Azryon
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)	24158	27186	25005	64°	Link	@Argai74
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)	23969	27310	23715	74°	Link	@Vergaro98
* Destian 15" / R5 5600X / RTX 3070	23849	27413	23390	69°	Link	@Tron1982
Ionico 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)	23561	26409	24486	62°	Link	@Brookes_117
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)	23395	25921	25549	62°	Link	@Seagull
Ionico 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)	22997	25502	25179	54°	Link	@tyburnjig
* Recoil IV 17" / i9 10850K / RTX 2080 Super	22784	26889	27659	58°	Link	@Besniq82
Ionico 17" / i7 11800H / RTX 3080 (dGPU only)	22663	30699	19582	72°	Link	@WolfSkyTrain
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)	22485	27639	21481	70°	Link	@Macco26
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (max fans)	22300	27352	21377	73°	Link	@Cenksenci
* Recoil 17" / i5 11400 / RTX 3070	22144	27145	20640	57°	Link	@WilRog
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (max fans)	22094	27815	20863	70°	Link	@pmarmotte
Ionico 17" / i7 11800H / RTX 3070	21733	27331	21611	72°	Link	@Illmatc-
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070	21688	23595	25021	68°	Link	@Seagull
* Recoil 17" / i5 11400 / RTX 3070 (4Gb RAM)	21674	27048	19787	56°	Link	@WilRog
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (stock)	20784	25591	19208	70°	Link	@kshnnnn
Defiance 15" / i7 10870H / RTX 3070 Max-Q	19971	24958	20582	68°	Link	@subjodge
Elimina Pro 17" / i7 10750H / RTX 3060	18839	22673	17813	69°	Link	@Looka
* Nova 15" / R7 3700X / RTX 2070	18775	20333	23464	64°	Link	@leebee2110
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3060	18719	21566	20244	68°	Link	@cmoto
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 3060	18495	21115	20851	77°	Link	@YogiC75
* Nova 15" / R9 3900 / RTX 2070	18413	20295	24123	58°	Link	@Hun
Elimina Pro 17" / i7 10750H / RTX 3060	18209	21223	17861	71°	Link	@RobBradley325
* Nova 15" / R5 3600 / RTX 2070	18185	20436	19222	69°	Link	@maxff9
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 3060 (max fans)	18173	20885	20605	72°	Link	@sandbags43
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 3060	17590	19725	20596	82°	Link	@sandbags43
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 3060	17576	20152	19895	78°	Link	@Style evo
Vortex IX / i7 9750H / RTX 2070	16846	20045	16264	63°	Link	@NomBidon
* Octane III 17" / i7 6700K / GTX 1080 (2016 test)	16725	21346	12508	N/A	Link	@Scott
Defiance V 17" / i7 8750H / RTX 2080 Max-Q	16631	21280	14033	62°	Link	@Scanian
* Octane III 17" / i7 6700K / GTX 1080	16627	21147	12649	60°	Link	@Scott
Recoil 17" / i7 8750H / RTX 2070 (2019)	16602	19479	15732	N/A	Link	@Greenman
* Nova 15" / R3 3100 / RTX 2070	16601	21039	13358	57°	Link	@FerrariVie
Optimus Pro XI 17" / R7 4800H / RTX 2060	15847	17047	20932	59°	Link	@andjef796
Cosmos IX 15" / i7 10750H / GTX 1650 Ti	9611	10587	17028	60°	Link	@Martinr36
Defiance II 15" / i7 6700HQ / GTX 980M (2016)	8521	9964	9765	N/A	Link	@andjef796
Defiance II 15" / i7 6700HQ / GTX 970M	6260	7077	8805	67°	Link	@Greenman
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / Radeon RX Vega 8	3549	4081	10451	55°	Link	@Wessexelectricnut

Where is the Elimina 17" with the i7 11800H ?

 

[SpyderTracks]

Where is the Elimina 17" with the i7 11800H ?

It's not there as no owners have uploaded results.

 

[Naseweisz]

Destian AMD 5800X, RTX3060:

I scored 21 136 in Fire Strike

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (notebook) x 1, 32634 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

 

[Tron1982]

Thanks for sharing your results ^^

 

[FerrariVie]

Destian AMD 5800X, RTX3060:

I scored 21 136 in Fire Strike

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (notebook) x 1, 32634 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

Rank updated, thanks for taking the time to run the benchmarks and share your results! Amazing CPU score, but that surely runs hot 🌶️

 

[Naseweisz]

Rank updated, thanks for taking the time to run the benchmarks and share your results! Amazing CPU score, but that surely runs hot 🌶️

Thank you. I had the laptop on a cooling stand and the internal fans forced to maximum to get through the benchmark. The temps ramp up too fast for the fans to spin up appropriately. I have now limited the processor to 65w in eco mode which runs much cooler and with minimal performance impact in my eyes: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75012255?

 

[ozka]

Have had a 14 core Intel Defiance+3070Ti a few weeks now but I haven't had time to try it with any games. Figured I should at least quickly test it to make sure it's as good as I hoped.

I scored 25 028 in Fire Strike

Intel Core i7-12700H Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (notebook) x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

Quite happy with this. Can confirm I had left everything stock and just set "performance" mode in control centre.

Also if it's of interest, I took separate note of my temps while it was running (I have the laptop on a fanless cooling pad to raise it)
Max/Avg temp (as reported by HWinfo):
CPU: 100c/61c
GPU: 86c/50c
GPU Hotpot: 105c/60c

That's just with the standard thermal paste though, going to repaste with Noctua at some point and expect those numbers to drop signifcantly.

edit: Actually, seeing that 100c from HWinfo, I suspect there was some throttling due to temps. Going to have to remember to try again when I get around to repasting.

Main specs:

Spoiler

Chassis & Display Defiance Series: 17.3" Matte, Full HD, 144Hz, Pantone Validated 72% NTSC, LED Widescreen (1920x1080)
Processor (CPU) Intel® Core™ i7 14 Core Processor 12700H (2.3GHz, 4.7GHz Turbo)
Memory (RAM) 16GB Corsair 3200MHz SODIMM DDR4 (2 x 8GB)
Graphics Card NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 3070 Ti - 8.0GB GDDR6 Video RAM - DirectX® 12.1

 

[FerrariVie]

Thank you. I had the laptop on a cooling stand and the internal fans forced to maximum to get through the benchmark. The temps ramp up too fast for the fans to spin up appropriately. I have now limited the processor to 65w in eco mode which runs much cooler and with minimal performance impact in my eyes: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75012255?

That is reasonable, in my opinion. Your CPU is quite more powerful than your GPU, so it makes sense to tune it accordingly to your usage. I've done the same with mine, even though I don't have eco mode on my CPU and ended up using manual OC which worked amazing.

Have had a 14 core Intel Defiance+3070Ti a few weeks now but I haven't had time to try it with any games. Figured I should at least quickly test it to make sure it's as good as I hoped.

I scored 25 028 in Fire Strike

Intel Core i7-12700H Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (notebook) x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

Quite happy with this. Can confirm I had left everything stock and just set "performance" mode in control centre.

Also if it's of interest, I took separate note of my temps while it was running (I have the laptop on a fanless cooling pad to raise it)
Max/Avg temp (as reported by HWinfo):
CPU: 100c/61c
GPU: 86c/50c
GPU Hotpot: 105c/60c

That's just with the standard thermal paste though, going to repaste with Noctua at some point and expect those numbers to drop signifcantly.

edit: Actually, seeing that 100c from HWinfo, I suspect there was some throttling due to temps. Going to have to remember to try again when I get around to repasting.

Main specs:

Spoiler

Chassis & Display Defiance Series: 17.3" Matte, Full HD, 144Hz, Pantone Validated 72% NTSC, LED Widescreen (1920x1080)
Processor (CPU) Intel® Core™ i7 14 Core Processor 12700H (2.3GHz, 4.7GHz Turbo)
Memory (RAM) 16GB Corsair 3200MHz SODIMM DDR4 (2 x 8GB)
Graphics Card NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 3070 Ti - 8.0GB GDDR6 Video RAM - DirectX® 12.1

Thanks for sharing your results, will update the rank shortly. Just one thing I noticed: Have you updated your Nvidia drivers? I think you probably doesn't have a version that 3DMark is able to recognize, so my guess is that it might be a bit old (or even a beta version?).

Regarding repasting, my own experience was that the GPU temperatures decreased quite a bit (around 5 degrees), but there was no significant CPU improvements. But your results may vary depending on how well PCS applied the paste to your CPU (mine seemed good enough). I've used Noctua HT-N2, by the way.

 

[Tron1982]

So, as i was extremely pleased with PCS, and as one of my sister was pleased with her destian, my other sister buy one too
This time, it's a 5600x cpu paired with a 3060 gpu :

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75411181

the laptop was up to date and i did the benchmark with the performance mode and the fan running at full speed
And to be honest, if the score look not too bad, the temperature look kinda hot ...

 

[ozka]

Regarding repasting, my own experience was that the GPU temperatures decreased quite a bit (around 5 degrees), but there was no significant CPU improvements. But your results may vary depending on how well PCS applied the paste to your CPU (mine seemed good enough). I've used Noctua HT-N2, by the way.

Thanks for sharing your results, will update the rank shortly. Just one thing I noticed: Have you updated your Nvidia drivers? I think you probably doesn't have a version that 3DMark is able to recognize, so my guess is that it might be a bit old (or even a beta version?).

Regarding repasting, my own experience was that the GPU temperatures decreased quite a bit (around 5 degrees), but there was no significant CPU improvements. But your results may vary depending on how well PCS applied the paste to your CPU (mine seemed good enough). I've used Noctua HT-N2, by the way.

Definitely up to date, I've been checking the drivers every day for both GPU and CPU since both of them get crazy temps under any kind of load are bugging me. I figured 3dmark just hasn't added the new chip's drivers to their list yet.

I since repasted with HT-N1 but the CPU didn't like it, seemed to have poor spread (apparently that paste can't handle really high temps?), had no change vs the stock mess. GPU dropped a bit though and I did get a bit better score after the repaste.

Pasted again today with Prolimatech Px-3 and the cpu droped a few degrees and got the best score so far:

I scored 25 485 in Fire Strike

Intel Core i7-12700H Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (notebook) x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com