Intel 13th and 14th Gen confirmed defective

FraSha

Active member
The reality with any BIOS flash is that it can fully brick your motherboard so you can't boot.

Doing it with PCS approval immediately covers you if something should go wrong, so in the very worst case, if the board did brick (which is highly unlikely these days), PCS would just swap it out.
What is the best way to get PCS approval, and to get any update through the right method, e.g. what is their channel for them?
 

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
So if we bought an intel-based PC within the last 6 months (in the UK), the Consumer Rights Act specifies that items sold must be "fit for purpose" and these clearly aren't, so we'd be entitled to a full replacement system based on AMD? Is that how we should read it?
No, Intel have rejected a recall, best you can do is get it replaced under RMA, but the same will happen to the replacement, just at a slower pace once the upcoming Microcode update has been applied. The build is working as it should do, it's only the CPU that's defective.

To add more to the wound, Intel have said they aren't halting sales even though they're defective!

I'm seriously hoping regulators step in.


If you're thinking PCS owe you a recall as the company that sold you the system, they are an OEM supplier, they don't manufacture anything, they merely build what you ask them to, they are not bound by anything related to defective parts such as this, that lies between you and Intel.

This is all true UNLESS injury results, that's a different matter.

PCS weren't to know that Intel chips were broken, it's not something that's in their liability. As an Intel Partner they can only operate on the terms given by Intel at that time. The only ones that can override that are Intel themselves, or regulators (Ofcom in the UK).



But your warranty obviously covers replacements under that, and the part (if you're suffering from issues) is definitely defective and comes under a warranty replacement.

But if you were raising it with Intel you'd have further complexities trying to get a refund as your cooling was not sufficient in the first place which would have exacerbated deterioration and that’s still an area that would need fixing even if you did get a replacement cpu
 
Last edited:

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
Just for anyone in the UK, if I was suffering from this, I would be emailing the ombudsman which can be found in the link below, purely to let them know that I thought Intel's behaviour was beyond reprehensible and extremely anti-consumer.


At this point, all we can hope is that public pressure builds enough that either Intel back down and issue a recall which they are going to try to avoid doing at any cost, or regulators step in and mandate it.

With increased public pressure from legal sources such as an ombudsman, hopefully that could perhaps reduce the amount of time for something to materialise

If you're abroad you will have your own local legal representatives, I'm sure google will be able to find that for you.
 

HomerJ

Author Level

Oh No Anyway GIFs | GIFDB.com
 

polycrac

Super Star
So, how fast are those RMAs going to go with 15,000 fewer staff to process them? Surely now is the time to recognise that you've under-invested in your processes and you need to put more into the business, temporarily, to dig yourself out of the hole you are in. I mean, assuming you don't actually slow down RMAs, where do these job cuts fall - Quality control? R&D?
 

TonyCarter

VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
So, how fast are those RMAs going to go with 15,000 fewer staff to process them? Surely now is the time to recognise that you've under-invested in your processes and you need to put more into the business, temporarily, to dig yourself out of the hole you are in. I mean, assuming you don't actually slow down RMAs, where do these job cuts fall - Quality control? R&D?
They're going to get some Boeing experts in to help them deflect and obfuscate
 

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
So, how fast are those RMAs going to go with 15,000 fewer staff to process them? Surely now is the time to recognise that you've under-invested in your processes and you need to put more into the business, temporarily, to dig yourself out of the hole you are in. I mean, assuming you don't actually slow down RMAs, where do these job cuts fall - Quality control? R&D?
Warranty times now are over a month apparently, not only that but due to poor wafer binning, Intel are running out of parts to replace them at all which is going to start causing further delays.
 

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
This will be somewhat related to Intel's share price situation. 15,000 layoffs incoming!

Jesus, this is the state since yesterdays earnings call

Kinda makes a mockery of the $10 billion they're saving by layoffs! And this is all BEFORE the lawsuits which is going to total multiple billions unquestionably.

 
Last edited:

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
This is not a quick video, but wow, is it worth it!
Just watching it now.

LTT did a video on what the issue was and it was an absolute shill piece, they in the main blamed board partners and I KNOW they understand enough of the history to know that isn’t true. So I didn’t post it because quite frankly it’s disinformation
 

polycrac

Super Star
Just watching it now.

LTT did a video on what the issue was and it was an absolute shill piece, they in the main blamed board partners and I KNOW they understand enough of the history to know that isn’t true. So I didn’t post it because quite frankly it’s disinformation
Just to fess up - I had to watch some sections on .75 speed to follow them!
 

TonyCarter

VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
Just watching it now.

LTT did a video on what the issue was and it was an absolute shill piece, they in the main blamed board partners and I KNOW they understand enough of the history to know that isn’t true. So I didn’t post it because quite frankly it’s disinformation
Always thought LTT was an advertiser's shill anyway, so haven't watched anything from him for about 5 years.
 

AccidentalDenz

Lord of Steam
I watched an LTT video a few years back where they "proved" an aircooler could keep whatever the top Intel chip at the time cool (10th gen? 11th gen maybe? I forget), but they used their open test bench and didn't mention the ambient temperature of their workshop, so it was entirely pointless. It clearly didn't resemble anything close to normal user conditions, and was very much shill clickbait. I've not bothered with LTT since. I did grab the LTT code for GreenManGaming's gold membership though, but then a few of us on here did!
 

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
I watched an LTT video a few years back where they "proved" an aircooler could keep whatever the top Intel chip at the time cool (10th gen? 11th gen maybe? I forget), but they used their open test bench and didn't mention the ambient temperature of their workshop, so it was entirely pointless. It clearly didn't resemble anything close to normal user conditions, and was very much shill clickbait. I've not bothered with LTT since. I did grab the LTT code for GreenManGaming's gold membership though, but then a few of us on here did!
This is what @Scott heavily called them out for, wasn't just LTT though, Hardware Canucks were just as guilty

Hardware Canucks have been really heavily biased with the new Snapdragon X laptops also, AMD have smashed them all over the place where it matters, but they're still shilling for the Snapdragon X laptops heavily.
 
Last edited:

TonyCarter

VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
This is not a quick video, but wow, is it worth it!
Steve needs a holiday after that 😖

I did notice at the end that Steve mentioned a PugetSystems article on their experiences (as a system builder), and was very interesting to me as I use PugetSystems as my multi-media benchmarking source, and if their ratios carry over to the wider population then it puts these current levels of failures into perspective vs other generations...assuming PugetSystems are not using bespoke settings for voltages, etc.

 
Last edited:
Top