I wasn't aware that the Sale of Goods Act had been replaced a couple of months ago, so I'll have a read of the new one.
Regardless, wouldn't anyone expect a laptop to last more than 1.5 years? If it doesn't, then what's the point of paying such a premium for a product? I certainly wouldn't have.
I don't think I'm being unreasonable in asking PCS to refund me or replace the laptop if it can't be fixed.
Hi njz, I just read over this thread and thought I'd add my bit
Just a quick question to start with is how long a warranty did you have with the machine? Was it the standard or silver 1 year warranty or not? (sorry if you've already mentioned this, I read through everything but may have missed it) Since if so then they don't have to do anything.
Yes, it was changed, but only applies for purchases made after that time, so won't apply to your laptop (I believe it came into effect in October 2015)
Well under EU law electrical items have a 1 year warranty on them and the old UK law was a "reasonable" amount of time (which is pretty vague and a judge has to decide if it came down to it).
As for the premium, you're paying extra for faster components such as a better processor etc. They're not charging you more because, for example, an i7 is more reliable than the i3, because it's not, they charge you more because it costs more for them to purchase in the first place
If the RMA's have been for the same problems then I'd say you're 100% being reasonable for some sort of refund, however if it's different issues each time then that's different. The same issue multiple times indicates there could be something wrong with the unit or the design of the item, but different issues just shows you've been unfortunate.
Anyway, hope you get something sorted
Respect to PCS. I shall be ordering from them next week (hopefully).
It's nice to know which sellers don't abandon their customers when things go bad outside of warranty.