First of all, a minor rant, if you all don't mind.
I ordered my Vortex IV laptop on the 9th May, and received it on the 2nd June. After a few days I began to realise there was a persisting problem; the display kept flashing green every time the resolution changed (during boot-up, for example), so I contacted PCS support via email on the 5th. On the 10th, after two replies in five days, they finally recommended that I request an RMA, and so I did on the 11th, and they received my laptop on the 13th. The last I heard from PCS was an email on the 16th saying they were processing my RMA. As of posting, it is almost the 20th June, a Friday, so I'm probably not going to get it back before next week now.
I'm a little disappointed that this fault slipped past testing in the first place, as it didn't take me long to notice it. I remember seeing someone mention in a post here about PCS booting the computer a significant number of times during testing, and if true I have to wonder how this fault was missed. Regardless, it feels somewhat unfair that I have to wait even longer for a working laptop despite this being PCS's oversight.
Anyway, I have a couple of questions. If someone could answer them accurately it would be appreciated.
On my 'Track Existing Returns' page, the RMA status is currently 'RMA Received'. Does this change if they are actually dealing with the fault? As it stands, I don't know if they are waiting for parts, or what.
My second question is about something I noticed on the RMA details page. At the bottom, it lists what was returned and what was authorised for return. Under the 'Returned' column I see that it says 'Original Packaging: NO', however I did return the laptop in it's original packaging, so this is incorrect, right?
I am a little concerned as their T&C states that they will not be responsible for any damage that happens whilst in transit if I didn't use the original packaging.
I ordered my Vortex IV laptop on the 9th May, and received it on the 2nd June. After a few days I began to realise there was a persisting problem; the display kept flashing green every time the resolution changed (during boot-up, for example), so I contacted PCS support via email on the 5th. On the 10th, after two replies in five days, they finally recommended that I request an RMA, and so I did on the 11th, and they received my laptop on the 13th. The last I heard from PCS was an email on the 16th saying they were processing my RMA. As of posting, it is almost the 20th June, a Friday, so I'm probably not going to get it back before next week now.
I'm a little disappointed that this fault slipped past testing in the first place, as it didn't take me long to notice it. I remember seeing someone mention in a post here about PCS booting the computer a significant number of times during testing, and if true I have to wonder how this fault was missed. Regardless, it feels somewhat unfair that I have to wait even longer for a working laptop despite this being PCS's oversight.
Anyway, I have a couple of questions. If someone could answer them accurately it would be appreciated.
On my 'Track Existing Returns' page, the RMA status is currently 'RMA Received'. Does this change if they are actually dealing with the fault? As it stands, I don't know if they are waiting for parts, or what.
My second question is about something I noticed on the RMA details page. At the bottom, it lists what was returned and what was authorised for return. Under the 'Returned' column I see that it says 'Original Packaging: NO', however I did return the laptop in it's original packaging, so this is incorrect, right?
I am a little concerned as their T&C states that they will not be responsible for any damage that happens whilst in transit if I didn't use the original packaging.