My 11.6" Inferno Review

Rodpad

Member
Here's my little review of the PC Specialist Inferno 11.6", based on the Clevo W110ER.

The important specs are:
i7-3630QM
8GB Memory
Nvidia GT 650m
120GB SSD

The textured rubber feel of the casing is very unique and prevents the laptop from slipping off surfaces or your lap. The smallish keys were fine to type on, even for my large hands. The Trackpad isn't brilliant, but I think it's more down to the included software. I'm sure I could probably find a third party solution to make the trackpad behave more like other notebooks.

Temperature-wise the machine will idle at the desktop at around 50c and reach a maximum of 80c (even when throttling is disabled). The machine doesn't have the cooling for the CPU to go into Turboboost mode, but that's to be expected. From all the tests I did the games were bottlenecked by the GPU and not the CPU.

Acoustics are silent when at the desktop, rising to a slight whisper when not on a flat surface or doing light work. During gaming the fan was no louder than my old desktop Nvidia GTX 560. I imagine quite a few people will use headphones, however the volume was loud enough to drown out the more than tolerable fan noise. Once gaming has finished the fans go all the way to silent again in under 15 seconds which is pretty remarkable.

Sound quality out of the box was average, however with some tweaking in the included THX utility I was able to get a much more acceptable sound. I put Surround to 40% (which basically just gives better stereo separation from the stereo speakers), and the "Speaker" setting (essentially bass as far as I could tell) to 90%. I turned off all other adjustments.

The screen is excellent. I much prefer the ever so slight "dusty" look you get with a matte screen compared to mass reflections on a glossy screen. The only minor point I will say is that out of the box the colours were rather dull and the gamma was a touch too high. I simply changed the Saturation to +10 and Gamma to 0.9 and the image was much more on par with my usual 24" gaming monitor. There was no input lag or ghosting.

Performance was fantastic for such a small and light device. I used Nvidia Inspector to force Adaptive Vsync since for some reason it's missing in the Nvidia control panel for the mobile 6xx series.

In Borderlands 2 with most settings on maximum I was getting highs of 60 and lows of 30 during intense firefights. I'd say at an average I get around 45fps. This is still much more than the consoles and looks much nicer.
Diablo 3 was always 60fps, never dropping.
Sonic and All Stars Racing Transformed was always 60fps, never dropping.

Sadly I don't have a great camera, so I'll simply just include these photos that I think show how nice the build and screen are. This was taken in typical home lighting. Any glaring, over saturation and colour bleeding will be due to my poor camera. The screen looks much nicer than this in person.

8467773933_793e1370fd.jpg


8467773643_b9dbe105eb.jpg


Here is also a direct recording from Sonic and All Stars Racing Transformed through MSI Afterburner. All settings are at maximum.
This was captured at the native resolution of 1366x768 on the laptop itself. I included the Rivatuner/MSI/HWinfo64 OSD so you can see temperatures, framerates and workloads. Pretty impressive stuff considering it's rendering the game, the movie capture and writing to the SSD all at the same time.
Note that the second number on CPU Usage is just the maximum recorded. The first number is the important current CPU Usage.

[video=youtube;eDICYIqHpvw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDICYIqHpvw&feature=youtu.be[/video]

If anybody would like to ask any questions about build, features or performance, please feel free to ask and I'll be happy to answer.
 

Attachments

  • clevo1.png
    clevo1.png
    523.5 KB · Views: 205
  • clevo2.png
    clevo2.png
    431.7 KB · Views: 199
Last edited:

tom_gr7

Life Serving
wow, that is really nice :)

Makes me want one for uni.....

A few questions

- how big is the power lead transformer thingy majiggy? I have an optimus with a 650m and the transformer is a bit big, too big to be mobile. Could you maybe take a pic of the transformer thingy?

- Battery life? good or bad? 6 hours? 8 hours?
 
  • Like
Reactions: beg

Rodpad

Member
The transformer is about 142mm x 72mm x 24mm. I'd say the weight is what I was expecting for the power being fed into this (120W).

Battery life in Borderlands 2 with everything ramped up to maximum (including screen brightness, CPU and GPU clocks, wifi etc) I calculated to be around an hour. Gaming with power saving tweaks you could probably get maybe two hours or more, but I'm just guessing at the moment. I'm yet to really test the battery to be honest.
 

beg

Bronze Level Poster
I ordered mine last night. Altough I got a 3640 instead of 3630 but I only got 90gb SSD.

Can't wait to get it!!!!!
 

Toxophilix

Bright Spark
Great review. Many thanks and +rep.

@Tom - I think if you spec a 35W TDP CPU then you can use a 90W transformer thingy. The 3632QM or all (I think) i5s fit the bill.

Speaking of which, if turbo is unavailable in gaming then what is the best CPU for this beast? I'm debating this with myself on the way home on the train :)
 

beg

Bronze Level Poster
Great review. Many thanks and +rep.

@Tom - I think if you spec a 35W TDP CPU then you can use a 90W transformer thingy. The 3632QM or all (I think) i5s fit the bill.

Speaking of which, if turbo is unavailable in gaming then what is the best CPU for this beast? I'm debating this with myself on the way home on the train :)
The turbo doesn't make another cpu more or less effective, and it's only in single threaded programs you need turbo.

Anyway I ordered another Cpu, the 3640 which has support for VT-D.

I'll install Arch linux and document and see if I can manage to run games rather flawlessly from linux.
 
Last edited:

PCS

Administrator
Staff member
Great review, + rep. We've added your review to the reviews section on our configurator! :)
 

Toxophilix

Bright Spark
The turbo doesn't make another cpu more or less effective, and it's only in single threaded programs you need turbo.
I think the quad-core processors will turbo up to a given clock-speed with two cores and then a higher speed with a single core. If I'm running a dual-threaded application (as many games appear to be) then am I better served by a 2.2 or 2.4 GHz quad core or a 2.5 or higher dual core, given that there will be no turbo-boost? That's a real question, I think.

Then again, games will probably not be CPU-limited anyway, and there are games that will use >2 cores. Also, I'm inclined to go for the 3632QM just .. because.

I'm also thinking of Linux gaming on one of these. This year, for the first time, I think it may be possible for PC gamers to ditch Windows entirely.
 

Rodpad

Member
Thanks for the rep Toxophilix and I'm more than happy to give PCS a nice well deserved testimonial. It's a great little machine, I'm surprised more press and enthusiasts aren't reviewing it to be honest.
 

Toxophilix

Bright Spark
Thanks for the rep Toxophilix and I'm more than happy to give PCS a nice well deserved testimonial. It's a great little machine, I'm surprised more press and enthusiasts aren't reviewing it to be honest.
You're welcome. I've been deliberating between the Enigma and Inferno for days and your review has helped me finally make my mind up: I'm ordering an Inferno tonight. Your comments about the screen have settled one my main doubts.
 

beg

Bronze Level Poster
Have you tried xsplit? Or any other streaming program, does it work well? :)

Did you order the 120w charger or the 90w?
 
Last edited:

Toxophilix

Bright Spark
Did you order the 120w charger or the 90w?
The configurator forces you to order the 120W charger if you order a 45W TDP CPU (which the 3630 is). (I think the GT-650M is 45W also, and obviously 45 + 45 doesn't leave a lot of change from 90.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: beg

Rodpad

Member
Sadly I only have a 1mb upload connection so I won't really be able to stream at an acceptable bitrate or resolution. When BT Infinity upgrade my cabinet I'll be quite tempted to use an external usb hdmi capture device to use the laptop as a dedicated xsplit machine when gaming on desktop.
 

beg

Bronze Level Poster
The configurator forces you to order the 120W charger if you order a 45W TDP CPU (which the 3630 is). (I think the GT-650M is 45W also, and obviously 45 + 45 doesn't leave a lot of change from 90.)

Alright, lucky me I ordered the 120w because I never got the warning, I just assumed I could charge my battery faster *Stupid look*

Sadly I only have a 1mb upload connection so I won't really be able to stream at an acceptable bitrate or resolution. When BT Infinity upgrade my cabinet I'll be quite tempted to use an external usb hdmi capture device to use the laptop as a dedicated xsplit machine when gaming on desktop.
Alright, I believe you could benchmark it even if the connection is bad, i don't think xsplit bottlenecks the system if your broadband is slow.
 
Last edited:

Rodpad

Member
Well at the end of the day I'm arguably doing the same thing when recording through MSI Afterburner, albeit with HDD access, but then I'm using an SSD so that isn't be an issue.

I don't really know of a fair way to "benchmark" xsplit.
 

beg

Bronze Level Poster
Well at the end of the day I'm arguably doing the same thing when recording through MSI Afterburner, albeit with HDD access, but then I'm using an SSD so that isn't be an issue.

I don't really know of a fair way to "benchmark" xsplit.

neither do I! :D

I guess you could try to run a game that doesn't perform perfect on the computer and then run xsplit on highest settings and see what the fps drop is or something similar.

Anyway, have you tried running any games through VM?
 

Rodpad

Member
As in playing Windows games under a Virtual Machine in Linux? Despite being an enthusiast PC user since I dropped my Atari ST, I can't for the life of me ever get Linux working, nor do I want to go back to the days of command line inputs.

Personally I have no need or interest in running another operating system. If I were to have a fiddle, it'd be a OSX hack job.
 
Last edited:

beg

Bronze Level Poster
:O
You should look into Ubuntu, it's such a userfriendly distro.

I myself look forward to getting arch linux working with DWM, the laptop is minimal, compact and cool, why should I ruin this amazing laptop with a mouse.
 

Rodpad

Member
Why would I want to use a virtual machine in Linux to play games that are natively supported in my current operating system? :)
 

Toxophilix

Bright Spark
As in playing Windows games under a Virtual Machine in Linux? Despite being an enthusiast PC user since I dropped my Atari ST, I can't for the life of me ever get Linux working, nor do I want to go back to the days of command line inputs.

Personally I have no need or interest in running another operating system. If I were to have a fiddle, it'd be a OSX hack job.
It might be that you are thinking of the Linux of many years ago. These days there is no need to use a CLI in Linux if you don't want to, although it does have the best CLI in existence if you actually need that level of control.

But for me, one of the reasons I prefer to use Linux is precisely because of the desktop GUI eye-candy. Windows is so drab by comparison with what can be done with compositing Linux window managers. Linux brought us the Compiz cube, Windows a bunch of solid-coloured rectangles that make me think I'm working in 16-colour VGA.

The installation is now, in most cases, just a matter of burning an ISO to a USB, plugging it in and letting it go.

But, of course, it's entirely your business which OS you use. (Indeed, it would be nice if we could convert Steve Ballmer to that viewpoint.)
 
Top