First up, the star of the show – the screen. I opted to spend the extra on the 1080p AUO 95% gamut LED. Suffice to say, it is magnificent. Colours are disturbingly accurate and vibrant. So far I’ve tested it by watching The Avengers from my Blu-Ray rip – keep in mind that this is a film I’ve watched a dozen times, and in some places it felt like I was watching a whole new film. Anywhere with even a subtle vibrancy of colour now looks spectacular, most notably the titular characters’ costumes – Iron Man’s suit looks fantastic, and the iconic suit and shield of Captain America (the red rings of the shield look especially good). And don’t get me started on Thor’s cape – I had no clue before how red it actually is. I don’t think I’ve ever seen something so red. And after saying that, I should point out that it doesn’t look over-saturated, just very red. There were similar improvements in the recently-released remaster of Star Trek: The Next Generation. I also tried out Minecraft for a while, which looked noticeably nicer but didn’t show as much of a fundamental improvement as The Avengers and TNG did.
Overall, the screen is just wonderful – one of the requirements for my laptop this time round was at least a 1080p screen, after finding that the 1336x768 14” screen on my previous laptop rather sub-par for some tasks during my first year of university. This requirement was what ultimately led me to PCS, as they were one of the few companies I could find that would offer all of the specifications I wanted. The relatively resolution (1080p screen in a 15.6” format) makes all text and video look wonderfully sharp, and allows you to fit really quite a lot of work into a small space. When doing my research, I found some people complaining that they had to increase the DPI setting in Windows to use it comfortably, and in fact if you get the OS preinstalled by PCS they set it higher by default. Personally I find the default DPI perfectly usable and exactly what I’m after in a high-resolution screen. It’s especially nice for doing word processing on, as the fantastic whites make reading and writing in Word 2010 (which I’m writing this in) very easy on the eyes.
Anyway, two paragraphs just on the screen is more than enough. Now, the.....
If absolutely the only thing you're doing on the laptop is gaming, then despite the noticeable improvement over ordinary screens I still wouldn't say it's worth the price difference. However if you're going to be doing other stuff, even just web browsing, then I'd recommend it.I read its not really that important if your using it mainly for gaming?
Which to choose?
Does diffrence cost this 85 pounds?
Opinions are welcome!
Thank you!
View attachment 4063View attachment 4064
My experience has been extremely disappointing (AUO 95%Gamut in Optimus V). Oversaturated unnatural colours with poor graphics display (different colour reproduction of web page graphics, on different search engines) despite return and apparent fixing job by PCS. Don't venture unless you have seen it for yourself. I have much cheaper 3 other standard HD display Laptops in the house hold. Each beats this one hands down.
From my experience the IPS Panel offers the best viewing angles vs the Standard or AUO. The AUO offers the better colour contrast out of the three. For gaming or general use the Standard matte is fine.