dangro474
Bright Spark
... So i'm an Nvidia fanboy, mainly due to the fact that the majority of my previous systems operated nvidia GPUs.
I have to say that both the 5870M and 6990M have been very impressive cards (aside from the whole 6970M enormous failure rate fiasco in 2011), but I always imagined i would opt for Nvidia cards in my future systems.
But then:
Obviously comparing a last gen card to current gen is beyond retarded, however given that the 7970M is cheaper than the 675M it make sme wonder if the upcoming 680M can live up to the hype and equal / outperform the 7970M...
It's been a while since any informationw as leaked / released, and what little information did see the light of day was not overly impressive. It is of course possible that in light of the 7970M's performance the 680M went back to the drawing board.
Now that Ivy Bridge has been released, the big question is: wait for the 680M (which may turn out to equal the 7970M at best and be more expensive as the previous top end comparrisons have been, such as 580M vs 6990M), or just go for the 7970M :/
Anyone remember the 480M by the way? What a colossal f*ckup that was.
.. and given that the 670 GTX and 660Ti GTX have both been confirmed as cut down versions of the GK104 (chip used in the 680 GTX) its looking more and more likely that Nvidia had originally intended the 680 GTX to be their 660Ti midrange card, remarketing it as a 680 when they saw it dominate ATI's (flagship?) 7970. Could the 7970M be an early model GPU similar to the 6970M with a 7990M to follow?
Two words. Mind f*ck.
Edit: All potential customers need to know is that the 7970M is really good and really cheap. As with the 6970M / 6990M and 5870M before them it dwarfs the competition.
... and after reading this thread I did something i'm not too proud of.
To wait, or not to wait...
I have to say that both the 5870M and 6990M have been very impressive cards (aside from the whole 6970M enormous failure rate fiasco in 2011), but I always imagined i would opt for Nvidia cards in my future systems.
But then:
Obviously comparing a last gen card to current gen is beyond retarded, however given that the 7970M is cheaper than the 675M it make sme wonder if the upcoming 680M can live up to the hype and equal / outperform the 7970M...
It's been a while since any informationw as leaked / released, and what little information did see the light of day was not overly impressive. It is of course possible that in light of the 7970M's performance the 680M went back to the drawing board.
Now that Ivy Bridge has been released, the big question is: wait for the 680M (which may turn out to equal the 7970M at best and be more expensive as the previous top end comparrisons have been, such as 580M vs 6990M), or just go for the 7970M :/
Anyone remember the 480M by the way? What a colossal f*ckup that was.
.. and given that the 670 GTX and 660Ti GTX have both been confirmed as cut down versions of the GK104 (chip used in the 680 GTX) its looking more and more likely that Nvidia had originally intended the 680 GTX to be their 660Ti midrange card, remarketing it as a 680 when they saw it dominate ATI's (flagship?) 7970. Could the 7970M be an early model GPU similar to the 6970M with a 7990M to follow?
Two words. Mind f*ck.
Edit: All potential customers need to know is that the 7970M is really good and really cheap. As with the 6970M / 6990M and 5870M before them it dwarfs the competition.
... and after reading this thread I did something i'm not too proud of.
To wait, or not to wait...
Last edited: